To achieve this, my sorcerer would be a batch gnome ( starting with alight and medium armor proficiency ), and have 14 Strength. Depending on how the campaign goes, around the prison term I ‘m getting close to having enough gold to buy a suit of plate armor I would forego an ability score increase in prefer of the “ heavily Armored ” feat ( besides giving me +1 Strength, raising that ability to the score needed to wear plate armor without getting a movement penalty .
now, I would have an AC of 18, which is quite high for a charming. But, as stated, my goal is for my character ‘s AC to be arsenic high as possible. Adding a shield to my character ‘s equipment would seem like a bum means to get an supernumerary +2 AC for an impressive total of 20. But this is where I ultimately get close to my question.
Shields have a separate proficiency in 5E and wearing armor you are not adept with not only imposes disadvantage on any ability check, saving throw, are attack roll that involves Strength or Dexterity, but besides makes it impossible to cast spells. not being able to cast spells would make my sorcerer kind of otiose sol in order to make this work I would somehow have to get proficiency with shields.
Read more : Top 8 ilovepdf mới nhất năm 2022
At this point there are two ways to get harbor proficiency in 5E : multiclassing one level in a course that has shield proficiency or taking the “ reasonably Armored ” feat. Multiclassing is n’t in truth an option for me since it would leave me unable to get the high level Wizard features. So I would have to take the feat fair to get carapace proficiency. Since I ‘m already technical with medium armor this seems like a complete neutralize of a feat to me. If that is as it is intended to work I would n’t take the feat.
sol my question is : Is the Moderately Armored feat really the only way to get shield proficiency without multiclassing?
Because it kind of seems like an supervision. now, the developers ca n’t sanely be expected to take in to account people like me creating stupidly specific situations like this : a heavily armor dwarf charming who uses a harbor ( my character would still be able to perform the bodily components for spells even wielding a harbor since he would not wield a weapon ). For the huge majority of character builds this would never be an issue, but I actually think shield proficiency should besides be included in the “ heavy Armored ” feat .
In my other balmy character concepts I have found that sticking to the rulebooks generally works out equitable very well. My DM besides sticks to RAW and does n’t use any home brew rules. normally I ‘m all for sticking to RAW but this fair seems kind of punch-drunk. According to the rulebook, my charming could hold a professorship in his leftover hand and would placid be able to cast spells, but when he ‘s holding a carapace this is suddenly no longer possible .